Return to Virginia Business - November 2001

The city of the future?
The Shenandoah Valley may hold clues to new trends in urban growth?

by Holly M. Rodriguez

Picture yourself atop a photo reconnaissance satellite at night, zipping along at 17,000 miles per hour about 40,000 miles above earth. As you pass over the eastern U.S., you look down upon the Shenandoah Valley. You see lights stretching like a string of pearls along Interstates 81 and 64. The brighter ones are the cities of Harrisonburg, Staunton and Waynesboro.

Squinting, you see something else: The spaces between the brighter spots are filled with smaller points of light. That's recent development - mostly gas stations, strip malls, subdivisions and industrial parks - in places like Fishersville, Stuarts Draft, Verona and Bridgewater, smaller communities just off the interstates. Stare a bit longer and the dots merge into a single blur with a strange shape, something new in the history of urban development - a string city.

A new metropolis is emerging from the quaint towns and farmlands of the Shenandoah Valley, and it's unlike anything Virginia has seen before. For decades, growth emanated from a traditional urban core, much like concentric circles moving away from a bull's eye. Now, suburban-style development follows Interstate corridors like oil along a wick, joining communities that once were distinct. You can see the pattern in the growth following I-95 from Washington to Fredericksburg and, with shrinking gaps, to Richmond and along I-64 to Hampton Roads. You can see it along I-85 in North Carolina, where everything between Charlotte and the Raleigh/Durham area has fused into an indistinguishable mass.

But the central Shenandoah Valley is the first place, in Virginia at least, where a predominantly rural region has crossed the urban threshold in the form of a string city. Rockingham and Augusta counties, along with the independent cities of Harrisonburg, Staunton and Waynesboro now count 217,000 citizens between them, according to the 2000 census. That's larger than the Charlottesville, Lynchburg and Danville Metropolitan Statistical Areas, and it's closing in on the Roanoke MSA. Meanwhile, Roanoke, through a similar process is fast becoming indistinguishable from the Blacksburg-Christiansburg area; if combined, the two regions would exceed 300,000 in population.

Urbanization offers many advantages. MSA status puts a community on the radar screen of national retailers, restaurants and service providers who would never consider locating there otherwise. It also makes a region more attractive to corporations looking for new industrial and commercial site locations; many site-location consultants won't consider recommending an area outside of an MSA. But the sprawling, low-density development also poses dangers. It threatens to increase traffic congestion along the Interstate arteries, drive up the cost of local government services and desecrate the stunning rural vistas that its residents value so highly. "There needs to be a clear edge between town and county, or urbanside and countryside," warns E.M. Risse, a Northern Virginia urban planner and University of Virginia adjunct professor who has watched suburban sprawl lay waste to swaths of Fairfax and Loudoun counties. "The pearls need sharp, not fuzzy, edges."

The federal Office of Management and Budget is in charge of identifying and classifying those pearls. The two most important criteria for MSA status are a population of at least 100,000 and a population density of at least 500 persons per square mile. The urbanized area must include a core city and at least some parts of the county, but does not have to include the entire county. OMB will apply the latest criteria to the 2000 census data to determine if any new regions qualify as MSAs. Results should be announced in mid-2003, according to Paul Mackun, geographer for the Census Bureau.

OMB goes strictly by the numbers, but it does consult local opinion on whether or not to combine neighboring regions that qualify as MSAs - as could be the case with Rockingham/Harrisonburg and Augusta/Staunton/ Waynes-boro - and what to name the consolidated entity. OMB consults the local congressman, who collects input from community leaders. Only recently have planners and economic developers in the central Shenandoah area focused on the impending questions. "That's a new issue for us," says Robin Sullenberger, economic development director for the Shenandoah Valley Partnership. "We're aware of it, but it's not been thoroughly discussed."

Local opinion proved decisive in 1990 when the Hampton-Newport News and Norfolk-Virginia Beach MSAs combined to create a single metro area under the banner of Hampton Roads. The impetus came largely from local marketers, says Arthur Collins, executive director of the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission. Knowing that national accounts often restrict their advertising to the top 25 or top 50 markets, media companies on both sides of the James River clamored to combine their respective MSAs in the hope of attracting national advertising dollars. The combination created a new MSA that ranked among the 50 largest in the country.

That kind of thinking won't come into play in the Shenandoah Valley, which has no prospect of becoming a Top 50 market this century. The MSA designation, however, may force valley leaders to address issues related to regional identity, growth and development with an urgency they've never faced before. Valley communities have a history of being pro-business and pro-development; yet they also value their small-town way of life. Do they want the national visibility and faster growth that MSA status might bring?

By many measures, the central Shenandoah has the strongest economy of any region in Virginia outside Richmond, Charlottesville and the Washington suburbs. During the 1990s, the population of Augusta, Rockingham and their three cities increased 15 percent - hardly a blistering rate of growth, but a strong performance for a non-metropolitan area. Unemployment throughout the region is less than 3 percent - less than 2 percent in Harrisonburg and Rockingham. Although the pace of income increases has lagged state averages in Augusta through the 1990s, Rockingham and Harrisonburg managed to keep up. During a decade in which income growth heavily favored the big metro areas, it was a respectable performance. All things considered, central Shenandoah offers a business climate and quality of life that many rural areas would envy.

Unfortunately, many of the problems associated with urban scale and suburban sprawl are asserting themselves. Most visible is the assault on the legendary Shenandoah landscape of manicured farms and rolling hills set between the imposing Blue Ridge and Allegheny mountain ranges. Every interchange along the interstate now hosts the usual cluster of gas stations and fast food restaurants, which act as magnets for strip-style shopping development. Leon Bouvier, a demographer from Old Dominion University in Norfolk, worries that the architecture of suburban sprawl that characterizes I-95 from Atlanta to Raleigh, from Washington to Norfolk, will predominate in the valley as well. "It's a Domino affect - when you bring in a McDonald's, then you have to bring in a Burger King and that's how it starts," Bouvier says. "The greed for growth, I believe, is a stronger force than the need to preserve the landscape."

Meanwhile, traffic along Interstate 81 is developing big-city congestion, aggravated by a surge in tractor-trailer traffic along what has become one of the major industrial arteries of the East Coast. In 1990, I-81 near the U.S. 250 interchange at Staunton recorded a daily average of 28,600 vehicles going both ways, according to Virginia Department of Transportation figures. By last year, the number had climbed to 42,000 - a 76 percent increase. A quarter of the vehicles consisted of tractor-trailers, which makes travel a nerve-wracking, even dangerous experience for motorists. But auto traffic, much of it generated locally, rose 66 percent as well.

Local officials can't control the truck traffic, but their land use policies do affect local traffic counts observes Risse, the Fairfax planner and consultant for the Piedmont Environmental Council, who worries that the Shenandoah Valley will follow the same path to traffic-congestion hell as Northern Virginia. The root of the problem is scattered, low-density development in which residential, retail and office/industrial activities are segregated. Forced into their cars for every trip, people overload a handful of highways and other connector roads - including I-81.

Scattered development also is more expensive for local government to serve, notes Risse. The number of people served by one mile of power line - or water line, sewer line, cable line, telephone line, for that matter - is far less than the number of people served by a mile of power line in the city because city residents live closer together and country residents are more dispersed. Sprawl-style development also makes it more expensive to deliver other services such as police protection, fire protection and school-bus transportation. Besides high costs, Risse is concerned about quality of life. Scattered development increases the length of commutes, not to mention driving time to the grocery store, to visit friends or to the soccer field.

Risse's warnings, however, seem to be falling on deaf ears. Central Shenandoah leaders, many of whom appear determined to preserve the region's rural, small-town character, value the kind of low-density development that Risse criticizes. Call it "rural sprawl" - 40-acre farmettes and a pick-up for every homesteader. Valley residents are attracted to the countryside because of the region's agricultural roots, says Bill Boyd, senior executive for Transprints USA in Rockingham County. "An individual's desire for space is more important than the mind or logistics when examining development." Quality of life is a very subjective measure, adds John Noftsinger, associate vice president for academic affairs at James Madison University in Harrisonburg. Coming at Valley folk with a big-city-style regime of controls would offend their sense of individual property rights and likely be doomed to failure, he says.

What's more, planning initiatives already in place emphasize reviving town centers rather than encouraging cookie-cutter sprawl along the superhighway. Staunton's economic development efforts, for example, are geared heavily towards renovating its bounty of historical 19th century buildings rather than building new mega-projects. Augusta County emphasizes service to existing industry rather than aggressive industrial recruitment. "Agricultural preservation is woven into the fabric and culture of the region, and growth is being carefully watched," says Sullenberger, the regional economic development director. "In every community, there is a threat of scattered development, but opportunities are being created to centralize services and development."

Meanwhile, a regional sense of identity is emerging that will help communities deal with growth-related problems. Central Shenandoah is dealing with economic development, work force development and technology issues on a regional basis, while cities and counties have forged a number of cooperative agreements for municipal services. Also, the Shenandoah Valley Planning District Commission outlined a plan of 14 specific initiatives to acknowledge the scattered growth pattern and what to do about it.

Should such measures work, they might help mitigate the current pattern in a beneficial way. Risse hopes that a future satellite shot of the Central Shenandoah Valley region will reveal brighter points of light on the "string of pearls" along I-81, absorbing the smaller, more scattered ones. Risse insists this is the only protective measure that exists to preserve the region's countryside. "If you continue with scattered development, you may as will live in an area like Manassas [which is more heavily developed], because that is what is slowly happening," he says. "When something grows out of control, we call it cancer," he notes.

Yet what neither Risse nor the Valley leaders can tell is just how powerful and unwieldy this new "string city" is. Bill Strider, executive director of the Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission, for example, doesn't see the MSA designation as happening for several years. He says growth will come at a slower pace. On the other hand, should the forces of interstate highway traffic flows, national marketing and unfettered commerce continue to come to bear, these new cities might keep growing no matter what controls are employed to contain them. Should that happen, many more strings of light will start glowing at night throughout Virginia and the U.S.

Return to Virginia Business - November 2001